Well, I did
something 'atrocious' with Compass by Mathias Énard. As soon as I started
reading this book, I began to wonder how his demonstration of 'everything
is connected' will look like in a visualization. The picture you see is the so
called network analysis of the connections made in this book.
Few pointers:
1. All the items
which are used in the book are broken in to 11 categories: Character, Concept,
Entity, Event, Language, Literature, Music, Painting, People, Person. A person
is a historical figure, a character is a character out of fictional writing, Event
is for example a battle and so on.
2. Each class of
item above are color coded.
3. Relations or
connections you see in the picture are limited to the connections made in the
book, that is to say, no connections are made from out of the book. In other
words, we could find more relations than those that are made here external to
the book from historical sources, but those are not used.
4. Size of a circle
(called Nodes) represents the magnitude of its relation (called degree), or how
much it is connected to other nodes.
Notes
1. Tools used - Gephi, YED, and good old N++
2. Potential imporovements abound in this representation, as for instance: (a) labelling the edges giving some clue to what actually connects two nodes, (b) bisecting the nodes in two broad super classes representing Orient and Occident, (c) assigning geospatial coordinates to the nodes based on the location and then overlaying this diagram on a map and so on.
Notes
1. Tools used - Gephi, YED, and good old N++
2. Potential imporovements abound in this representation, as for instance: (a) labelling the edges giving some clue to what actually connects two nodes, (b) bisecting the nodes in two broad super classes representing Orient and Occident, (c) assigning geospatial coordinates to the nodes based on the location and then overlaying this diagram on a map and so on.
Link to higher resolution drawing: Link